Hello dear readers :-)
Many of you have a negative attitude towards tattoos and do not understand why people "stain" their skin with partacks.
Still, tattoos have one fat plus - they can cover skin flaws. For example, various scars, in particular stretch marks.
Those who have dramatically lost weight are embarrassed to even undress on the beach. Because stretch marks do not even take a tan, they are visible and do not look aesthetically pleasing (I mean that they do not look aesthetically pleasing for the owners of stretch marks, who find it difficult to put into their heads the installation "love yourself the way you are").
Postpartum stretch marks are very difficult to cover with tattoos. This is because during the work of the tattoo artist, the client breathes, and the skin on the belly either stretches or takes on its original appearance. In addition, the pigment of the ink changes in the stretch marks area, and over time the stretch marks continue to heal and become paler.
Stretch marks add volumetric texture to the body art composition. Sometimes it looks even better than without stretch marks. As an example - the photo below. Stretch marks or scars, it doesn't matter. The main thing is what makes the clouds visually three-dimensional. And it looks pretty interesting.
The next option is when the tattoo artist uses white pigment to make the contour of the drawing appear embossed and voluminous. In this case, the white pigment is visually mixed with the stretch marks, and even if you look closely at the photo, you will not find the real contours of the stretch marks.
Tattoos are not cheap. But believe me: when compared with the courses of laser resurfacing, complex procedures for removing stretch marks (which 100% never removed), then it is cheaper to cover not the most aesthetic places with a tattoo and just take care of her.
Is it beautiful or not - it all depends on your personal preferences and the artist's sketch, according to which the master will fill the tattoo.
Again, the sketch is important. Better to spend money on a good sketch. You can find an artist at a distance, take pictures of places with stretch marks. And he already, guided by the texture of stretch marks on the skin, will come up with a sketch. There is nothing shameful and funny in this. For an artist, this is just a job and an interesting task facing him.
To be honest: the options available on the Internet for overlapping stretch marks with tattoos are often terrible, artists and tattoo artists have something to work on. The niche is, in fact, very poorly occupied.
With tattoos, everything is simple: moisturizing creams and gentle peeling are enough. You don't need to invent anything. Cleansing is an important step as the layer of dead epithelium can fade the tattoo pigment.
People of mature age do not disdain tattoos. And even the problem of a loose belly can be aesthetically solvable: it is really possible to come up with a picture with a suitable texture, for example, the texture of a rocky mountain, which will look more interesting on a loose belly.
In any case, it's up to you: to have plastic surgery or go to a tattoo parlor. Or you can spit on all this and try to love yourself. But life is harsh: even if you are in the mood for accepting yourself as you are, it is worth going to the beach, catching sidelong glances from other people - and the person forgets about self-love.
I am for making a person less nervous in this life. And if he cannot accept a loose belly, the presence of many scars on the body or stretch marks, then blocking the unaesthetic look with a tattoo is the best option that will calm him down and add confidence in itself.
Do you think tattoos are a good option for hiding stretch marks or not? Share your opinion in the comments.
