Many people do not like my colloquial style of presentation. In fact, I switched to this vernacular style from the academic scientific through the informational.
It didn't come from a good life.
Now a whole army of anonymous impostors or rogues from medicine is publishing a sea of low-quality medical information. I really don't like it. Probably because I am a man of the old school and entered the medical school back in the USSR.
People are easily bought for technical terms and scientific style of presentation. And I like to convey the fact to the reader more, regardless of the style and dialect.
Maybe it's because I have taught / treated students for 19 years. They are fed up with the Internet. Nothing sticks them out. But the guys need to know at least a minimum of information about their health and medicine.
It does not matter in what form I present it. The main thing is the result. The reader must understand the meaning and remember. Emotions help it.
Well, it would be very useful for health to be more critical of scientific lies. You can't let them dazzle you.
So bear with it. As Zhenya Lukashin said: "I often have to hurt people so that later they can live well."
There is also a kind of readers who were not going to understand anything. What they need is science, which creates a pleasant white noise in their heads. They like to hear from an experienced and reliable doctor with a bunch of medical terms next to them.
Let the doctor rustle his papers and write the prescription. It turns out a pleasant feeling of the presence somewhere near a large and incomprehensible medicine. Which one could trust without straining the brain. Sound familiar?
Have you seen how they cut soap in front of the camera or apply makeup in a whisper? This trick tickles the brain of some people. They like it. If such a provocative statement is offered in a vernacular style, then the person begins to freak out. This is a separate story.
Well, do you need the truth, or do you crumble the soap?
