Question: With all due respect - heading incorrect. The action of garlic has not been properly confirmed. But that doesn't mean that it doesn't help.
Answer: You are wrong. This is what it means. That is, you can eat them, but you don't have to claim that it helps. On our planet, prayer helps half of the population. Let's then organize covid monasteries?
Question: Well then, following your logic, or rather the methods of the scientific approach, which, unfortunately, I have not studied, until the benefits of prayer have been proven, their uselessness cannot be asserted. That is, the logic is this: the usefulness of garlic for colds has not been proven. This does not mean that garlic does not help, it means that no research has been done. The usefulness of prayer for colds / volvulus / leukemia has not been proven. But this does not mean that it is useless / harmful. This means that research has not been done properly. It seems logical to me. No?
Answer: No. This means that it is useless. Even if there is no harm, this does not mean that you can do this. A minimal hint of efficiency is needed. That is, some kind of poorly organized research from which it is difficult to draw a conclusion. If there is such research, and there is no harm from prayer, then let him pray.
If there is harm, then they will not recommend and even warn that this is not necessary. Well, that is, if the praying person bruises his forehead every time, they will say that it is harmful, and with the minimum expected benefit, this should not be done. It's not worth it. But no one will recommend anything without minimal indications of benefits.
That is, the doctor cannot recommend garlic to everyone, because it seems to him that it is useful and little harm. One should keep one's “seems” to oneself and not distribute it.
In the case of garlic, scientists, even after receiving a positive result, abstained from conclusions. And just because the whole planet eats garlic. If there were real benefits from him, then it would inevitably be proved. But no. They prove it with great creak. This is suspicious, and therefore no conclusions will be drawn.
