Alas, we have taken an interest in the personal lives of others. Roughly speaking, poke their noses into other people's family plans. There are no, or not, and are going to give birth to another... Why not start the second / third brother - sister... Familiar questions? It is still the most harmless.
But the 7 issues that are brought to a white heat only child mothers.
"One child - it's not a child." Who? Chair, asteroid, ciliate-shoe? Uttering such "truth" can not know why the family only one child, which may be associated with not the most pleasant things to health or finances, housing. Have a second child - this does not make a cat.
"TWO easier." Yes, but three - nothing at all to do, not to mention the quartet of children. Should not rush these "untested" platitudes. All children are different and unique, so the second baby can be much problemnee firstborn.
And then - you do not know, that has passed through this particular mother during her first delivery. Or maybe she just physically can not become a mother for the second time, and you are his remarks to hurt her.
"It is time to think about the second - you do not get younger." Fairness and ethical level 80. And then now parents are in the different ages. Everyone makes a choice.
"When the second will give birth?" On the lips of strangers this question is not even as a question, and the requirement to shame and confirm their intentions.
Second child for conscious and responsible people - this is not just another conception, another decree one more spending on diapers and cereal, and a very serious step that can make a difference in their life.
"You're his IZBALUESH, he later sits on the neck". Why spoil it? Because the child does not have brothers and sisters? This is not an argument, but a question of proper education.
"He would be boring." Why? If a child has many friends on the playground, in kindergarten, in the classroom.
The main thing - do not turn a blind child, and helping friends with their peers on the playground, organize events, invite friends to visit the child. It's not about the number of children, and in the ability and willingness of parents to raise my child.
"WHEN YOU WILL NOT WITH HER HUSBAND, THE CHILD WILL REMAIN ONE". The child will be left alone, because he will have friends, loved one nearby, native people. Simply put, the child will have time to find a lot of ways to avoid loneliness, to be loved and surrounded by caring people. And it's worth noting that the brothers and sisters, alas, not always friendly to each other. It's not about the number of children and education.
Do you also think so? And that your answer was more conscious, take note, as the order of birth affects the nature and destiny of the child.
